Chhattisgarh High Court rejects TET candidates’ pleas over application error | India News

Spread the love


2 min readRaipurJun 13, 2026 05:50 PM IST

The Chhattisgarh High Court has dismissed petitions filed by seven candidates who appeared for the Teachers Eligibility Test (TET), seeking correction of their category from OBC Creamy Layer to OBC Non-Creamy Layer after the declaration of results, holding that allowing such changes would compromise the integrity of the examination process.

The petitioners had challenged the Chhattisgarh Vyavsayik Pariksha Mandal (Professional Examination Board) and its examination controller, claiming that while filling out the online application forms, they had inadvertently selected the category “OBC Creamy Layer” instead of “OBC Non-Creamy Layer”, to which they actually belong.

In one of the petitions, a candidate stated that she had scored 80 out of 150 marks in the TET conducted on February 1. Since she was treated as an OBC Creamy Layer candidate, she was required to secure a minimum of 60% (90 marks) to qualify and was declared ineligible.

The petitioner argued that had she been correctly categorised under OBC Non-Creamy Layer, she would have been eligible for relaxation in qualifying marks and would have cleared the examination.

Opposing the pleas, counsel for the respondents, Avinash Singh, submitted that candidates had been provided a correction window from December 9 to December 11, 2025, after the application deadline of December 8. He also cited earlier High Court rulings rejecting similar requests.

Dismissing the petitions, Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal observed that responsibility for correctly filling the application form rested entirely with the candidate. Once the correction window closed, the details furnished in the application attained finality and formed the basis for evaluation and declaration of results.

The court held that permitting changes in category after declaration of results would “undermine the sanctity and integrity of the examination process”, create uncertainty and open the floodgates for similar claims, affecting the rights of other candidates and the fairness of the selection process.





Source link


Spread the love

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *