Animal Defence Law Toothless, Ludhiana Ranks 8th On National Crime Record Bureau’s Cruelty Scale. | Ludhiana News

Spread the love


Animal Defence Law Toothless, Ludhiana Ranks 8th On National Crime Record Bureau’s Cruelty Scale.
A whipped dog or cattle crammed into trucks rarely get help. The latest national crime data exposes not just a streak of cruelty in India’s metropolitan centers, but a broken enforcement system. Cow eyes stare through slits in the truck wall

Ludhiana: The latest National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) report places this industrial hub of Punjab eighth among India’s 34 metropolitan centres for recorded animal cruelty.Ludhiana recorded seven cases under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act in 2024. Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar topped the list with 49 cases, followed by Vijayawada (36), while Agra and Vasai-Virar tied for third with 26 cases each. Among regional cities, Amritsar and Chandigarh reported zero cases.Within Punjab, Ludhiana’s seven offences accounted for almost 11% of the state’s 64 total cases, ranking it third behind Pathankot (15) and Patiala (eight). For a dog attacked with a sword in a neighbourhood, or cattle crammed into trucks for transit, help rarely arrives.Activists Warn of UnderreportingLocal animal welfare advocates argue the official statistics reflect a severe underreporting of actual abuses rather than a lower incidence of crime.Sandeep K Jain, a Ludhiana resident and co-opted member of the Animal Welfare Board of India, welcomed the NCRB’s decision to publish this data for the first time but noted significant systemic gaps.“Many offences never reach authorities because parties reach informal compromises, or the incidents simply escape the notice of activists,” Jain said. “Furthermore, enforcement is hindered by a lack of specialised staff, inadequate budgets, and the fact that volunteers lack the statutory power under Section 34 of the Act to intercept, search, or fine offenders.”Jain noted that most local prosecutions involve the thrashing of domestic dogs or the severe overcrowding of cattle during commercial transit.Mani Singh, state president of Help for Animals and local head of People for Animals, pointed out the legal hurdles in securing prosecutions .“Securing a first-Information report (FIR) from police is difficult because it demands strict evidence,” he said. “Gathering that proof is inherently challenging because the animal victims are voiceless and eyewitnesses rarely come forward.”



Source link


Spread the love

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *